Note
Click here to download the full example code
Auto-tuning a Convolutional Network for x86 CPU¶
This is a tutorial about how to tune convolution neural network for x86 CPU.
Note that this tutorial will not run on Windows or recent versions of macOS. To
get it to run, you will need to wrap the body of this tutorial in a if
__name__ == "__main__":
block.
import os
import numpy as np
import tvm
from tvm import relay, autotvm
from tvm.relay import testing
from tvm.autotvm.tuner import XGBTuner, GATuner, RandomTuner, GridSearchTuner
from tvm.autotvm.graph_tuner import DPTuner, PBQPTuner
import tvm.contrib.graph_executor as runtime
Define network¶
First we need to define the network in relay frontend API.
We can either load some pre-defined network from relay.testing
or building relay.testing.resnet
with relay.
We can also load models from MXNet, ONNX and TensorFlow.
In this tutorial, we choose resnet-18 as tuning example.
def get_network(name, batch_size):
"""Get the symbol definition and random weight of a network"""
input_shape = (batch_size, 3, 224, 224)
output_shape = (batch_size, 1000)
if "resnet" in name:
n_layer = int(name.split("-")[1])
mod, params = relay.testing.resnet.get_workload(
num_layers=n_layer, batch_size=batch_size, dtype=dtype
)
elif "vgg" in name:
n_layer = int(name.split("-")[1])
mod, params = relay.testing.vgg.get_workload(
num_layers=n_layer, batch_size=batch_size, dtype=dtype
)
elif name == "mobilenet":
mod, params = relay.testing.mobilenet.get_workload(batch_size=batch_size, dtype=dtype)
elif name == "squeezenet_v1.1":
mod, params = relay.testing.squeezenet.get_workload(
batch_size=batch_size, version="1.1", dtype=dtype
)
elif name == "inception_v3":
input_shape = (batch_size, 3, 299, 299)
mod, params = relay.testing.inception_v3.get_workload(batch_size=batch_size, dtype=dtype)
elif name == "mxnet":
# an example for mxnet model
from mxnet.gluon.model_zoo.vision import get_model
block = get_model("resnet18_v1", pretrained=True)
mod, params = relay.frontend.from_mxnet(block, shape={input_name: input_shape}, dtype=dtype)
net = mod["main"]
net = relay.Function(
net.params, relay.nn.softmax(net.body), None, net.type_params, net.attrs
)
mod = tvm.IRModule.from_expr(net)
else:
raise ValueError("Unsupported network: " + name)
return mod, params, input_shape, output_shape
# Replace "llvm" with the correct target of your CPU.
# For example, for AWS EC2 c5 instance with Intel Xeon
# Platinum 8000 series, the target should be "llvm -mcpu=skylake-avx512".
# For AWS EC2 c4 instance with Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3, it should be
# "llvm -mcpu=core-avx2".
target = "llvm"
batch_size = 1
dtype = "float32"
model_name = "resnet-18"
log_file = "%s.log" % model_name
graph_opt_sch_file = "%s_graph_opt.log" % model_name
# Set the input name of the graph
# For ONNX models, it is typically "0".
input_name = "data"
# Set number of threads used for tuning based on the number of
# physical CPU cores on your machine.
num_threads = 1
os.environ["TVM_NUM_THREADS"] = str(num_threads)
Configure tensor tuning settings and create tasks¶
To get better kernel execution performance on x86 CPU, we need to change data layout of convolution kernel from “NCHW” to “NCHWc”. To deal with this situation, we define conv2d_NCHWc operator in topi. We will tune this operator instead of plain conv2d.
We will use local mode for tuning configuration. RPC tracker mode can be setup similarly to the approach in Auto-tuning a Convolutional Network for ARM CPU tutorial.
To perform a precise measurement, we should repeat the measurement several times and use the average of results. In addition, we need to flush the cache for the weight tensors between repeated measurements. This can make the measured latency of one operator closer to its actual latency during end-to-end inference.
tuning_option = {
"log_filename": log_file,
"tuner": "random",
"early_stopping": None,
"measure_option": autotvm.measure_option(
builder=autotvm.LocalBuilder(),
runner=autotvm.LocalRunner(
number=1, repeat=10, min_repeat_ms=0, enable_cpu_cache_flush=True
),
),
}
# You can skip the implementation of this function for this tutorial.
def tune_kernels(
tasks, measure_option, tuner="gridsearch", early_stopping=None, log_filename="tuning.log"
):
for i, task in enumerate(tasks):
prefix = "[Task %2d/%2d] " % (i + 1, len(tasks))
# create tuner
if tuner == "xgb" or tuner == "xgb-rank":
tuner_obj = XGBTuner(task, loss_type="rank")
elif tuner == "ga":
tuner_obj = GATuner(task, pop_size=50)
elif tuner == "random":
tuner_obj = RandomTuner(task)
elif tuner == "gridsearch":
tuner_obj = GridSearchTuner(task)
else:
raise ValueError("Invalid tuner: " + tuner)
# do tuning
n_trial = len(task.config_space)
tuner_obj.tune(
n_trial=n_trial,
early_stopping=early_stopping,
measure_option=measure_option,
callbacks=[
autotvm.callback.progress_bar(n_trial, prefix=prefix),
autotvm.callback.log_to_file(log_filename),
],
)
# Use graph tuner to achieve graph level optimal schedules
# Set use_DP=False if it takes too long to finish.
def tune_graph(graph, dshape, records, opt_sch_file, use_DP=True):
target_op = [
relay.op.get("nn.conv2d"),
]
Tuner = DPTuner if use_DP else PBQPTuner
executor = Tuner(graph, {input_name: dshape}, records, target_op, target)
executor.benchmark_layout_transform(min_exec_num=2000)
executor.run()
executor.write_opt_sch2record_file(opt_sch_file)
Finally, we launch tuning jobs and evaluate the end-to-end performance.
def evaluate_performance(lib, data_shape):
# upload parameters to device
dev = tvm.cpu()
data_tvm = tvm.nd.array((np.random.uniform(size=data_shape)).astype(dtype))
module = runtime.GraphModule(lib["default"](dev))
module.set_input(input_name, data_tvm)
# evaluate
print("Evaluate inference time cost...")
print(module.benchmark(dev, number=100, repeat=3))
def tune_and_evaluate(tuning_opt):
# extract workloads from relay program
print("Extract tasks...")
mod, params, data_shape, out_shape = get_network(model_name, batch_size)
tasks = autotvm.task.extract_from_program(
mod["main"], target=target, params=params, ops=(relay.op.get("nn.conv2d"),)
)
# run tuning tasks
tune_kernels(tasks, **tuning_opt)
tune_graph(mod["main"], data_shape, log_file, graph_opt_sch_file)
# compile kernels in default mode
print("Evaluation of the network compiled in 'default' mode without auto tune:")
with tvm.transform.PassContext(opt_level=3):
print("Compile...")
lib = relay.build(mod, target=target, params=params)
evaluate_performance(lib, data_shape)
# compile kernels in kernel tuned only mode
print("\nEvaluation of the network been tuned on kernel level:")
with autotvm.apply_history_best(log_file):
print("Compile...")
with tvm.transform.PassContext(opt_level=3):
lib = relay.build(mod, target=target, params=params)
evaluate_performance(lib, data_shape)
# compile kernels with graph-level best records
print("\nEvaluation of the network been tuned on graph level:")
with autotvm.apply_graph_best(graph_opt_sch_file):
print("Compile...")
with tvm.transform.PassContext(opt_level=3):
lib = relay.build_module.build(mod, target=target, params=params)
evaluate_performance(lib, data_shape)
# We do not run the tuning in our webpage server since it takes too long.
# Uncomment the following line to run it by yourself.
# tune_and_evaluate(tuning_option)
Sample Output¶
The tuning needs to compile many programs and extract feature from them. So a high performance CPU is recommended. One sample output is listed below.
Extract tasks...
Tuning...
[Task 1/12] Current/Best: 598.05/2497.63 GFLOPS | Progress: (252/252) | 1357.95 s Done.
[Task 2/12] Current/Best: 522.63/2279.24 GFLOPS | Progress: (784/784) | 3989.60 s Done.
[Task 3/12] Current/Best: 447.33/1927.69 GFLOPS | Progress: (784/784) | 3869.14 s Done.
[Task 4/12] Current/Best: 481.11/1912.34 GFLOPS | Progress: (672/672) | 3274.25 s Done.
[Task 5/12] Current/Best: 414.09/1598.45 GFLOPS | Progress: (672/672) | 2720.78 s Done.
[Task 6/12] Current/Best: 508.96/2273.20 GFLOPS | Progress: (768/768) | 3718.75 s Done.
[Task 7/12] Current/Best: 469.14/1955.79 GFLOPS | Progress: (576/576) | 2665.67 s Done.
[Task 8/12] Current/Best: 230.91/1658.97 GFLOPS | Progress: (576/576) | 2435.01 s Done.
[Task 9/12] Current/Best: 487.75/2295.19 GFLOPS | Progress: (648/648) | 3009.95 s Done.
[Task 10/12] Current/Best: 182.33/1734.45 GFLOPS | Progress: (360/360) | 1755.06 s Done.
[Task 11/12] Current/Best: 372.18/1745.15 GFLOPS | Progress: (360/360) | 1684.50 s Done.
[Task 12/12] Current/Best: 215.34/2271.11 GFLOPS | Progress: (400/400) | 2128.74 s Done.
INFO Start to benchmark layout transformation...
INFO Benchmarking layout transformation successful.
INFO Start to run dynamic programming algorithm...
INFO Start forward pass...
INFO Finished forward pass.
INFO Start backward pass...
INFO Finished backward pass...
INFO Finished DPExecutor run.
INFO Writing optimal schedules to resnet-18_graph_opt.log successfully.
Evaluation of the network compiled in 'default' mode without auto tune:
Compile...
Evaluate inference time cost...
Mean inference time (std dev): 4.5 ms (0.03 ms)
Evaluation of the network been tuned on kernel level:
Compile...
Evaluate inference time cost...
Mean inference time (std dev): 3.2 ms (0.03 ms)
Evaluation of the network been tuned on graph level:
Compile...
Config for target=llvm -keys=cpu, workload=('dense_nopack.x86', ('TENSOR', (1, 512), 'float32'), ('TENSOR', (1000, 512), 'float32'), None, 'float32') is missing in ApplyGraphBest context. A fallback configuration is used, which may bring great performance regression.
Config for target=llvm -keys=cpu, workload=('dense_pack.x86', ('TENSOR', (1, 512), 'float32'), ('TENSOR', (1000, 512), 'float32'), None, 'float32') is missing in ApplyGraphBest context. A fallback configuration is used, which may bring great performance regression.
Evaluate inference time cost...
Mean inference time (std dev): 3.16 ms (0.03 ms)